Tell Us Your Story! | Donate Now
1-877-4DIVEWISE
(1-877-434-8394)
A Freediving Education Initiative Report an IncidentDiveWise on Facebook

A look at Breath-Hold Incident Statistics from Divers Alert Network





Credits
Neal W. Pollock, PhD; Mary F. Riddle, BA; Jenna M. Wiley, BS; Stefanie D. Martina, BS; Mitchell N. Mackey, BS Divers Alert Network, 6 West Colony Place, Durham, NC 27705

Introduction

  • Breath-hold diving, in-water activity with a mask but without the use of scuba or surface-supply breathing gas, has grown in popularity as an underwater activity with numerous sub-disciplines.
  • While generally safe, the aquatic realm is unforgiving and serious injury or death can occur. Learning from breath-hold incidents is important to increase diver awareness and promote safety.

Methods

  • Divers Alert Network (DAN) developed a dedicated database to collect breath-hold incidents from 2004 forward.
  • Cases are identified through automated keyword internet searches and voluntary submission. Incidents are followed up through requests to participants or local authorities.
  • DAN reviewed cases from 2006 through 2011.
  • Data are reported as number (n) of cases and/or mean±SD with ranges.
  • The percentage of known data is specified for variables with incomplete records.

Results

  • A total of 417 cases were captured; 308 fatal and 109 non-fatal.
  • 51±9 (40-63) fatal cases annually (Figure 1).
  • Incidents were reported from 56 countries.
  • 46% in America; 11% in Australia; and single digits elsewhere.
  • Victims were 41±17 (5-93) years of age (92% known) (Figure 2).
  • Most victims were male (86%).
  • Dive activity was described as snorkeling (46%), spearfishing (25%), freediving (18%) and collecting (11%) (92% known).
  • Incidents were reported in ocean (90%), swimming pools (3.6%), lakes/quarries (3.3%), rivers/springs (1.8%) and other (1.3%) (94% known).
  • Witnesses were present in 61% of cases (64% known) but generally with incomplete details of the event.
  • The majority of victims were diving with a partner or group (59% known) (Figure 3).
  • Disabling injuries were most obvious with acute animal or boat trauma. The most common disabling agent was loss of consciousness, typically intuited in fatal cases from witness reports and/or circumstances due to the lack of physical evidence.
  • Initial triggers were frequently impossible to confirm in fatal cases.
  • Excessive hyperventilation was most frequently suspected.
  • Health issues implicated for many older victims.

Conclusions

  • Breath-hold incidents frequently present with incomplete history and poor physical evidence.
  • Excessive hyperventilation is the most commonly identified risk.
  • Additional information is required to identify triggers and disabling injuries. Fully detailed non-fatal case reporting will likely be critical to improve our understanding of contributing factors

New Initiatives

  • Augmenting the ongoing case capture program, DAN has developed an online reporting system to collect case reports for which more complete information may be available.
  • Subgroup focus on breath-hold, rebreather and open-circuit modes.
  • Incident Report